What the original report says
On 6 October 2025, OpenTofu published an interview with Fidelity Investments’ cloud automation leader about moving from Terraform to OpenTofu.Read more
It is a named enterprise migration account published by the project, rather than an independent benchmark or an IGEARS delivery case.
IGEARS analysis: evidence of feasibility is not evidence of fit
A large organisation’s experience makes the option worth investigating.Read more
It does not establish your own provider compatibility, delivery effort or cost outcome. Your team may depend on different private modules, hosted approvals, policy engines and state-management arrangements.
Questions for an internal discovery session
Use the published case as a prompt to examine your own operating boundaries.
Supporting detail
- Who owns configuration, state and emergency access?
- Which hosted-platform functions are required beyond the CLI?
- Can a new maintainer reproduce a plan from the documented versions?
- What proves that a rollback preserves changes made after cutover?
Choose a bounded first move
Select a non-production workspace with a clear owner and representative dependencies.Read more
Preserve backups, compare plans and document differences before any apply. Decide separately whether to retain hosted workflow services. IGEARS can help turn these questions into a reviewed pilot and an operating handover that another qualified team can follow.
Sources and verification
- OpenTofu: Interview about Fidelity Investments’ migration, 6 October 2025 ↗
- HashiCorp: Licensing FAQ ↗
Policies and features can change. Verify the current terms and your installed edition before implementation.